perm filename SCIENT.LE1[LET,JMC]1 blob
sn#194394 filedate 1975-12-31 generic text, type C, neo UTF8
COMMENT ā VALID 00002 PAGES
C REC PAGE DESCRIPTION
C00001 00001
C00002 00002 To the Editors of the Scientific American
C00005 ENDMK
Cā;
To the Editors of the Scientific American
Sirs:
I was puzzled by the following statement from the World
Health Organization quoted on page 56 of your January issue:
"%2If traffic accidents are tackled by methods similar to those used
against the great killing diseases, the present epidemic of road
deaths could be made to disappear just as plague and smallpox have
now been eliminated almost everywhere in the world%1".
Do they propose to inoculate new cars with fragments from
from smashed cars or eradicate junkyards as sources of contagion?
But I read on, and on page 84, the description of how a
smashing stomatopod evicts another stomatopod from a desirable burrow
made every thing clear. The WHO statement is simply an example of
the method nature has evolved whereby one bureaucracy expands its
functions into an area over which another bureaucracy has previously
had jurisdiction.
The sentence on page 84, "%2We do not know whether the
eviction results from a reduction of the oxygen in the blocked
cavity, from a fouling of the water in the cavity by agressive
defecation or from prolonged stress%1." shows the evolutionary
advance since the ancestors of WHO diverged from those of the
stomatopods.
Sincerely yours,
John McCarthy